The old board's new actions Should the new board be set aside (and the three Mosquiteers have already resigned) and the old board be back, then it can be presumed that ex-Chairman Fu will be Chairman Fu again.
The reconstituted board will consist of Ash, Matt Ball, Bronson, Jefferies, McClay, SDykes and Fu.
Ash seems to have been involved only with MSQ over the last decade; Matt Ball is with Bralorne and is seemingly very well respected in mining circles; Bronson's recent activity is about the same as Ash's; Jefferies is MSQ (but the financials indicate that he's owed a chunk of money, even though the two McClays have seemingly been paid out and the Kid has flogged a lot of paper into the market); and McClay is McClay.
Support for a vote to remove McClay? Ash could go either way, but presumably on the side of integrity; Ball should be for integrity; Bronson..no idea; Jefferies might vote to ptotect his shares and receivable from further risk; McClay is a definate no, and SDykes and Fu have already demonstrated their integrity.
IMO:
Ash..likely a yes
Ball, a yes
Bronson..no
Jefferies..likely a yes
McClay..no
SDykes and Fu..two yeses
That puts it at two noes and five yeses. The trouble with nepotism is that those who don't get the cash and who engage in lucrative unreported share transactions have to watch their backs if there's an opportunity to hold a new vote with new knowledge.
Based on my opinion and probabilities, I think that it's bye bye McClay.
Better get those overtime bills in, Chimpers.