Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited V.MSQ



TSXV:MSQ - Post by User

Post by stallion12on Aug 09, 2012 12:43pm
207 Views
Post# 20198932

MSQ

MSQ

MOSQUITO RECEIVES REASONS OF B.C. SUPREME COURT REGARDING 2011 AGM

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. has received reasons of the British Columbia Supreme Court in the petition filed by International Energy and Mineral Resources Investors (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. challenging the outcome of the company's annual general meeting held Dec. 16, 2011.

In its reasons, the court held that there were shortcomings with respect to the voting and other procedures adopted at the annual general meeting, principally with respect to the use by the company's proxy solicitation firm of a telephonic voting system. The court held that, while there was no evidence of mala fides or bad faith, the effect of the voting and procedural irregularities was contrary to the dissident's reasonable expectations with respect to the conduct of the annual general meeting. The court ordered that the annual general meeting and the resolutions passed be set aside and that the company reconvene an annual and special meeting, subject to certain conditions.

The company is continuing with its review of the judgement and is seeking advice from its legal and other advisers as to the interpretation and consequences of the judgement, including with respect to an appeal thereof

Bullboard Posts