Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited V.MSQ



TSXV:MSQ - Post by User

Comment by halcrowon Aug 10, 2012 1:13pm
114 Views
Post# 20204506

RE: RE: RE: Good news, better news

RE: RE: RE: Good news, better news

"...Mr. McKay...has deep Chinese connections, including that China-based chairman of the company..." Thom Calandra interview with B McClay

https://www.stockhouse.com/Columnists/2011/Jan/28/World-s-largest-open-pit-molybdenum-deposit-yet-to

Now that ex-ChairmanFu is Chairman again, doesn't he have the authority to restrict the issuance of news releases to himself and/or his designated spokesperson?

Justice Fisher's reasons for judgement was released on 2012-08-08 (reinstating Chairman Fu), yet , on August 9, 2012, Brian A McClay issued a news release stating that, "...The Company is continuing with its review of the judgement and is seeking advice from its legal and other advisors as to the interpretation and consequences of the judgement, including with respect to an appeal thereof..."

Would ChairmanFu want to continue to waste the shareholder's money in a likely futile appeal of ChairmanFu's successful petition which restored him to his Chairmanship? Doubtful indeed.

Wonder if the other directors could be held liable for the legal costs associated with, "...is seeking advice from its legal and other advisors as to the interpretation and consequences of the judgement, including with respect to an appeal thereof...?

Wouldn't that be something if they were, hey Puke-Fluke? Enough to make you turn in your keyboard and Chimper-of-the-month cap, innit?

Bullboard Posts