RecycLiCo Battery Materials Inc V.AMY

Alternate Symbol(s): AMYZF

RecycLiCo Battery Materials Inc. is a battery materials company specializing in sustainable lithium-ion battery recycling and materials production. Its segments include the research and development of recycling battery cathode waste in lithium-ion batteries and the acquisition, exploration and development of interests in mineral resource projects in British Columbia, Canada and Arizona, USA. It has developed advanced technologies that recover battery-grade materials from lithium-ion batteries, addressing the global demand for environmentally friendly solutions in energy storage. It recovers up to 99% of cathode metals from battery waste and upcycles them into high purity, battery-ready materials. Integrate a bespoke RecycLiCo Clean Spot plant and its patented closed loop, multi-tons per day, lithium-ion battery recycling and upcycling process-on-site-within a client’s battery factory or battery recycling operation. Its properties include Artillery Peak, Rocher Deboule and Lonnie.

TSXV:AMY - Post by User

RecycLiCo Battery Materials Inc

Bullboard Posts

Post by heavymonzyon Aug 11, 2012 5:06pm

236 Views

Post# 20207807

Korelin will interview Larry Reaugh Monday.

On August 11, 2012 at 10:32 am,
Trevorsays:

Hi Al. Realizing this is off topic from todays segments, I would like to hear your thoughts on the following regarding American Manganese Inc. You would know like the rest of us that the company is currently in talks with potential strategic partners and on that note, I would like your thoughts on an answer I received from Mike Macleod the other week regarding the status of work programs based on the TetraTech recommendations in the PFS recently released. I asked Mike if indeed these studies had commenced and his answer came back stating that the studies had been designed but not yet put into action as the company was currently in talks with potential strategic partners and that depending on the successful conclusion to those talks, the priorities of those parties would in essence dictate the order of work to be carried out going forward. I’m paraphrasing but that was the gist of his response.
What do you think Mike could have meant by ‘those parties priorities’?
One would think that moving forward on the PFS reco’s (studies) would be the main priority moving forward with a partner, however, based on his comment, one might conclude that the priority could be fast tracking the battery powder program so to be included in the feasibility study. If this was the case, it would make sense that getting the flow sheet for that side of the operation designed first and then move to optimization of the mine plan, improving on the TetraTech conclusions in one all encompassing effort.
Do you think this is a fair conclusion?
What are your thoughts on this ‘priorities’ comment by Mike Macleod?
Thanks for entertaining the question (if you do), and hopefully you can give more than an ‘I don’t know what he might have meant’ answer, lol.

Reply to this comment
- On August 11, 2012 at 1:38 pm,
  Big Alsays:
  
  Afternoon Trevor,
  
  The best answer I can give is to interview Larry.
  
  I will do that on Monday.
  
  Best,
  
  Big Al
  
  Reply to this comment
  - On August 11, 2012 at 2:03 pm,
    Trevorsays:
    
    Thanks Al, I look forward to that interview. Hopefully, you can get Larry to flesh this ‘priority’ statement out a bit with regards to any potential strategic partner’s development ‘strategy’. Mike couldn’t provide any more detail at this time due to the discussions with the parties being on-going at present, however, it might be possible for Larry to provide more general examples of scenarios that could come to be according to the direction a partner might want to take, be it a partner from the battery industry or steel industry.
    Thanks again.
    
    Reply to this comment