Physical Interpretation of -1 oz per ton? Well, this should be interesting. The appendix shows many many meters of core with a gold content of -1 oz per ton. LOL. I wonder what the physical interpretation for that grade is? If one accepted the appendix at face value, including the -1 oz per ton intercepts, anyone mining that mountain would end up having to buy gold on the open market and deliver to the site.
Too funny.
I wonder how many of the BCSC original issues with the draft have been addressed.
I love the bit about the BGM drill core database consisting of a set of Excel spreadsheets. That is too precious.
Well, it should be a very interesting trading week as we all wait with bated breath for the BCSC response. Somehow, I very much doubt the BCSC signed-off on the August 13th midnight filing. There has been a serious attempt to serve up some crow but before I'll byte I'm waiting for my favorite chef to fly in an do the preparation -- no just anyone can do up Crow-ala-Busang the way that I like it. Anyways, I'm looking forward to the results :)
Good luck to all you the longs. Its been fun.