Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Galway Resources Ltd V.GWY



TSXV:GWY - Post by User

Comment by oldtimer42on Aug 17, 2012 6:44pm
256 Views
Post# 20231683

RE: GWY - Consolidated Area 43-101?

RE: GWY - Consolidated Area 43-101?

The suggestion that Batista has AUX working with EOM, GWY and possibly CVZ is a bit out there. If you want to minimize return that is certainly the way to do it. Batista will take everyone to the cleaners. Amber Capital (EOM) would not buy into that nor would GWY. Divide and conquer at it's best.

 

A more likely scenario is a merger between GWY and EOM. The combined land would surround AUX, plus there is the GWY fractions on AUX property. The old addage, there is strength in numbers holds true here. The combined resources would at least equal AUX and draw a higher price from Batista. Plus, in the interim, Amber has deep pockets.

 

But, what do I know. I put 3 to 1 on George Custer!

 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>