csmat Most of the ore grade to date, has been drilled between lines L4488650 and L4488500. These lines project to approx. 400 metres.Has anyone else cut and pasted these interesting correlations with data available to date? This picture is intriguing when projected north and then south to the RRFZ between 12-12 and 12-14 ('proposed' or in progress?) where line L4487400 intersects.
With 4 wells "in progress" where are the other two? Notice that 11-17 has moved since earlier base map, leaving over 750' between it's 65' of 0.9grs and10-06's 135' of 0.9 grs. Maybe one rig Is drilling in there? Relevant ? Good question, as those results along with 12-11 (12-08's redirect) may supply the sort of info digestable to us shareholders.
Anyone curious if 10-15 was re-entered in 2012? as was 11-13 this summer? "Colorcode" looks that way And it is on structure to csmat mapping.
More immidiately relevant is how have drillbore details tied to this csmat base study as directed by the study.
It's sad how shareholders are left once again to the mercy of grades from assays, when this new integrated data has opened doors relative to the scale of this one structure. Especially to the degree it has hopefully sharpened perspective. Also sad, is our 'updated' yet still confusingly plotted and childishly illustrated drillhole location map. If that perspective reflects the shareholders' limits, then forget ever seeing any 3-D, (Which I sure as f.. hope they are employing in they're program.)
Maybe the geo.'s are protecting their ideas as something personal and hence more valuable and or above the credit or understanding of mere laymen. Maybe it's a decision from management? Oh well fyi the next 3 assays due are results of earlier, less sharpenned thinking.
Yes I'm ticked with loss in paper value. There are a lot of shallow ozs. in our 800' x 500' X section envelope that has stretched well over 1000' in strike. Yet GSV's evidence is SO Poorly illustrated that even Brent Cook cannot visualise it ! (not that Brent is any sage ha ha )