RE: RE: fact is: T.CAA is the Yes Grizz imagine that - shareholders of a publicly traded company grumbling about the share price. Bizarre isn't it. Aren't we all just a bunch of whiners. And thanks for setting us straight on that $800,000 consulting fee expense. Nice to see at least one former director seems to have made out well over this lawsuit isn't it.
And I see as is it seems to be your usual practice to anyone who is the least bit critical of this company. To hand out it's phone number and advise us to give Roland a call. Personally though I'm thinking that maybe if Roland is the one in charge of public relations for Callinan that maybe he's the one that should making some calls if he isn't already. Maybe that's our problem here, too many people sitting around waiting for the phone to ring, and not enough calls going out.
I'm not to sure about your claim that Rolands top priority is to increase the financial strength of the company over the share price performance. As a shareholder I think I and others would be sorry to here that if this is the current managements philosophy. Especially considering for a company Callinans size the financial strength of the company was never a problem. Even long before Roland showed up on the scene. I suppose like that bad $800,000 consulting agreement, that's another thing we can pin on the old management. And not current management.
You may not think so Grizz but I do. And as far as I am concerned the true measure of any public companies management. Whether we are talking about Callinan, Hewlett Packard, or Yahoo; is the performance of the companies stock. So in my opinion at least, by that measure thus far I think this management team has been a dismal failure.