Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Galway Resources Ltd V.GWY



TSXV:GWY - Post by User

Post by Fragmanon Sep 02, 2012 10:11am
266 Views
Post# 20306101

my take

my take

galway was very particular about what they did not have to pledge as security for their 10 mil. note.  i phoned and asked what they did pledge and the young lady told me she did not know but she was pretty sure it was confidential.  never ever heard of a bank giving money for nothing...ask mark knoffler.

eom is up the same as us.  the rest do not seem to have moved. ??????  maybe they put up the collateral.

in reality world the land tracts owned by others had to be paid and it is for sure that there is gold under there or galway would never lay out cash

batista does not have the cash nor inclination but eom does.  could there be a loophole somewhere that helps eom mine their property if they own our grandfathered adit. just asking

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>