RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: POS "LN was/is highly profitable and the sp at three million oz would have saved the shareholder's equity by sparing us the massive dilution Lenic likes to label 'accretive'.
A lot of really bad decisions were made and the share price suffered for five years as a result.
Lenic chose to go breakneck at Shafter and Joe and Jane shareholder took the hit.
When is payback time? Let's hope Lenic understands the difference between payback and rollback because he is not paying attention to his shareholders that bought his Shafter lunch."
Amazing, that's pretty much been my beef with AUN over the years, and for some reason, when I posted these sentiments, all Matt could do was disparage and criticize me.
Eloquently stated Matt! (Unfortunately, he won't see this post because he placed me on ignore awhile ago.)
Anyway, onward and upward now, fellow AUN shareholders. I think we're going to be in for quite a ride over the next year.