OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
2new4investon Sep 19, 2012 5:02pm
197 Views
Post# 20387854
RE: RE: RE: RE: About Production - 2guys
RE: RE: RE: RE: About Production - 2guys Regardless, all of our comments, good or bad about this company has no effect and will not have an effect because the company is not trading.
This message board is not just for your pumping of this company. It is for others to discuss the possible detriments brought to the shareholders by actions that are again obviously not in agreement with the BCSC.
I certainly didn't write the editorial article called "Deja vu for Barkerville shareholders" on August 24. This person certainly knows more history of the people involved in Barkerville than I do. I suppose you think the writer of that article is wrong about the story? Making stuff up?
Based on the article, Barkerville after it's name change owns this property for 12 years and all of a sudden it can potentially hold 65-90 million ounces of gold. Nice projection when gold prices are hitting record highs. Coincidence..maybe. Can you prove intention by releasing a press release with this kind of info. This press release just didn't float through the air and on to the news circuit on it's own. The company intentionally put this info out and the BCSC didn't like it. No press release would go out with board and/or CEO approval.
Is this a case of Intent? Don't know but it's here for people to read.