Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Galway Resources Ltd V.GWY



TSXV:GWY - Post by User

Galway Resources Ltd > SP
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(7)
•••
Comment by NaturalCurrencyon Sep 20, 2012 5:03pm
232 Views
Post# 20392902

RE: RE: SP

RE: RE: SP

You think we will get $5.13 for California (how less could it be after expenses + Vetas drilling) and YET that would be less than Vetas? Wow.

A $5 for California is $750M+. How do you think we will get it with 1.1M Oz? Batista is not going to pay for $650~$700/Oz for Cali.  $400 ~$450, I can still understand. 

  

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities