Nattering Nabobs of Negativity and TUO Gee, the subject is so good, I should stop right here.
I'm sure everyone, stock-knockers and boosters, have had their fill of a lot of the baloney posted here by bashers and, yes, maybe are tired of guys like me who believe in the company's future constantly pointing out the obvious potential of Teuton.
So what is there to talk about when both sides of the argument can demonstrate negatives and positives? I say that it's up to the investor to decide which outweigh which. For me, it's a no-brainer because I believe that we're out of the "dream" stage and well into the overture for what I think will turn out to be a great gold play...
Even with my limited geological background, I don't think it's a stretch to say that in all likelihood, Treaty Creek is an extension of the Iron Cap Zone in the Mitchell deposit which has already been confirmed by Seabridge as a multimillion ounce system (5 million oz. au measured and indicated and 3.5 million ounces inferred!) and the last drill results at Treaty Creek -- though limited in scope -- showed the same grade of gold as our prolific next door neighbor and -- correct me if I'm wrong -- this is no 2 or 3 km. away neighbor but one that's a few hundred meters away! Moreover, we know Seabridge wants to tunnel through the property at the very least, and that gives TC project holder(s) yet another source of potential revenue.
It may sound crazy but Treaty Creek may very well hold billions in gold. Hardly scientific and rank speculation but I base it on the fury of the battle over the property, the preliminary results of AMK's limited drilling and the virtual (new word coming) "on-toppedness" of TC to Seabridge's Iron Cap Zone. Regardless of how the litigation comes out, there's enough to go around. The delay is excruciating but bearable in light of the prize.
Then we have the sleeper Tennyson, the much maligned deal with HDI cited over and over and over again as not being a "good deal." Folks, it's a DEAL. And with high-grade "hot spots" popping up all over BC (VOK, Clone; Seabridge's Camp Zone and some at Homestake Ridge), this is just the beginning of the ballgame.
So say what you will, I still think this will be Canada's "gold Bakken," and I can stand all the doubters' posts because when things start popping, I won't have to pay up for shares; I've already put my money where my mouth is and I haven't done too badly over the years. (See my "tout" of NDM in the twos here a few weeks ago.)
There's truth in what many negative posts say about the stock in "the NOW." But I'm looking at "the LATER."
I don't know the motives of all the negative posters; they differ. Some, I'm sure, have an AMK shareholding agenda; they are angry about what they perceive to be an "unfair" lawsuit and are simply lashing out at Teuton shareholders; others are shareholders who are impatient, that know we "have it" but are frustrated at the pace of progress. What does all the chatter here amount to (including mine)? Not much; just the writer's viewpoint on any given day.
The circumstantial evidence that suggests that investors consider buying shares of Teuton is strong, in this writer's opinion; and the negative posts don't do anything to change my mind. Remember, anyone with a computer can spew nonsense, even "typists" that don't one one share! Again, take everything with a grain of salt and judge Teuton's potential for yourselves.
And fortunately, that's the end of my boring lecture!!!
Mark