RE: RE: RE: RE: Base Case--gross I am not suggesting there was a break fee. I am suggesting that, if there was no break fee or lawsuit, then the deal breaking was the result of pre-set requirements that were not met or an agreement between the Parties. If INE was bidding for everything, they would not voluntarily end the bid for Wildmare.
And given that the Wildmare deal just ended at Sept. 30, other buyer "looking at it" may not include Wildmare. Assuming the website is up to date, everyone can LOOK https://www.finavera.com/projects/canada, but obviously what counts is surrounding infrastructure and longterm wind data that you can not determine by looking or even a few weeks of measurements.
So if there was a deal on the table for Wildmare and their other suiters were busy kicking the tires, they would have been interested in the other projects. And it might bring in the most money if they sold the projects separately.
When I read the latest FVR PR carefully, I am impressed that the goal of Management is to set up a situation "where shareholders are part of a stronger platform to access the value of these assets"
Does this sound to you like there will be a sale with the shareholders will get actual cash money? Do you want to be part of a stronger platform or do you want fair value for the projects, in their current state, in cash?