Thicker Those are some pretty encouraging words from Coffin......especially that he thinks the thickness of CSL's zone should be larger than Golden Saddle -- and I totaly agree with him....CSL surface footprint is just much stronger all around than the Golden Saddle, and if it is that strong of mineralization on the surface, you can bet it is going to be that strong underneath as well -- how many times have we heard that the geology looks exactly the same.....I dont think it is a stretch to think that CSL should have better thickness than the Golden Saddle and also better grades too, just judging from the overall strength and consistency of the deposit at surface.
When it comes to the Yukon, there has been no one better than the Coffins.....they really were a large part of creating all the hype and interest in the Yukon in the past few years, and no one can deny their track record there.....
they had KAM at .25 ......20 bagger at its high
they had ATC around 1.00 ......for 10 bagger at its high
they had UW around .40? ...... cant remember for sure but that would be approx 6 bagger
they had CSL at .15 .....for a 4 bagger....so far
Used to be subscriber to Coffins but did not renew this year.....mostly cause it seemed like the Yukon was so dead this year -- but then along came CSL -- hopefully they can breathe a little life into the area.....we'll see
GL,
Ren