Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Curis Resources Ltd PCCRF



GREY:PCCRF - Post by User

Comment by elgin1on Oct 06, 2012 12:44am
155 Views
Post# 20455569

RE: ADEQ Temporary APP

RE: ADEQ Temporary APP

Sungoldz so nice to hear from you again since your last and only post on May,2012 on stockhouse. So where's your buddy ErinG?  Still trying to educate CUV investors?  Remember your last post cautioning CUV investors:

 
 

"Very funny, Elgin1.  Actually, I was trying to point out the dangers of transporting the huge quantities of sulfuric acid required for in-situ mining.  On January 31, 2012 there was a hazardous chemical incident not far from here on SR 77 between Winkleman and Globe where a tanker truck loaded with sufuric acid leaked the acid on to the highway and closed it for hours.  In addition to the sulfuric acid, there are at least 10 other toxic chemicals that will be shipped to Florence on Hunt Highway and stored on-site in a tank farm.  The large number of tanker trucks using the two-lane highway and the tank farm they'll be stored in certainly won't be unobtrusive; but Curis says you'll hardly know they're there.  Sure.  Also, maybe you should ask Curis why they publicly told many people before their zoning change was denied, including a State Senator, that it wouldn't be financially feasible to mine just the State land and then, after the denial, they suddenly decided they could make a go of mining only that small, 160-acre plot.  Do you think it has anything to do with trying to inflate their stock price and not scare off their investors?  Also, as an investor, I sure would be skeptical of a company that gives away 25% or more of its production over the life of the project just to get $40 million to run a short-term production test facility on 160 acres."


 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>