LLEN defense to CA allegations! They do not say ... the Info in theSAIC files are wrong!
They simply say ... ... the SAIC files can not be used in US courts!
very very weak defence! ... It's like saying ... yes ... I am a fraud ... but the documents that proof it can not be used to here! ...
As a threshold matter, Plaintiff argues that this Court cannot consider the SAIC filings
submitted with the Second RJN without an “apostille”because they are foreign records subject
to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 44. Opp. at 5-7. Not only is Plaintiff wrong on the law, he has already
conceded that Rule 44 has no applicability here. In Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’First
RJN, Plaintiff argued: “SAIC filings are not ‘foreign public documents,’”and did not object on
the basis of Rule 44. D