Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Niko Resources Ltd NKRSF

Niko Resources Ltd is an oil and natural gas exploration and production company.


GREY:NKRSF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by perfectplayon Oct 15, 2012 2:31am
507 Views
Post# 20483120

FYI

FYI

 

Hazira field: DGH puts breaks on additional cost recovery of $2.74 million, also disallows drilling of two wells

Oct 14The DGH has rejected the GSPC-Niko consortium's -- which owns the Hazira PSC -- request to allow additional cost recovery to the tune of $2.74 million for one well (dubbed Hazira-24) in the block saying that the solicitation was unjustified. Along with this, the regulator has also denied approval for drilling of two more wells (dubbed Hazira-15 and Hazira-23) in the block. 
8The regulator has turned down the request for approval of drilling two locations -- H-15 and H-23 -- on the ground that the same was not approved by the Management Committee (MC) of the block. Though the other well H-24 was approved by the MC for drilling as a slant well, the operator drilled the well and incurred an expenditure of $4.76 million against the MC approved budget estimate of $2.02 million, thereby leading to a cost overrun of $2.74 million.
8The operator, since then, has been requesting the MC to approve the drilling of two wells H-15 and H-23 and also allow cost recovery of the overrun amount of $2.74 million for the slant well H-24.
8On the suggestion of the MC, the DGH reviewed the issue and arrived at the conclusion that the reservoir development was poor in well areas H-15 and H-23, as a result of which it did not make any sense to approve the drilling plan for the two wells.
8Then again, for the well H-24, the DGH pointed out that as the operator had incurred a cost overrun of $2.74 million -- 136% of the MC approved budget for the slant well -- because of a change in the drilling and completion strategy which was not approved by the MC, the cost recovery could not be justified.

https://www.indianpetro.com/index.jsp

 

Bullboard Posts