Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

RE: Environmental Protection and CEC marketing cla

[mokita]

sorry to disagree, but misleading investors re working with stakeholders, blah, blah, blah to achieve "social licence" when EVERY stakeholder has publically opposed the mine but is  part of the environmental review sham, with claiming BC has "worldclass" environmental protection when the Premier has promised the industry to remove regulations that would impact corporate profit, with promising 350 jobs for the duration of the mines l6 year life(despite a plunge in market demand, with promising to protect the environment despite the reality that coal mines contribute irreperable damage to air and water quality that costs Canadian taxpayers billions, to providing high paying job to locals despite heinous trend to hire easily exploitable and cheap Chinese miners, and last but not least, providing studies with statistics that suggest the coal is of high quality and that over 80% is usable constitutes in many ethical 

in some views (like SEC) misleading investors and this is a blog for potential and current investors.  Best to review CEC data provided to American investors, that they are not responsible for reports on coal quality or if CEC does not upgrade quality once and IF in production.