RE: RE: RE: RE: again It was probably delayed because LOGM's new application for summary judgement gives rise to a different playing field. In other words there is no point in setting timetables and directions for a final trial when one party has brought an application that may render that superfluous. In fact, exactly what happened with the first application (which bought them over a year's delay!)
Does the most recent one have any chance of success?- One needs to see all the material filed in support to form a conclusion, but in the interim, I would be interested to read Sangeth's views.