Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc T.MPVD

Alternate Symbol(s):  MPVDF

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. is a Canada-based diamond company. The Company’s primary asset is its 49% interest in the Gahcho Kue Mine, a Joint Venture with De Beers Canada. The Gahcho Kue Joint Venture property consists of several kimberlites that are actively being mined, developed, and explored for future development. The Company’s Kennady North Project includes approximately 113,000 hectares of claims and leases surrounding the Gahcho Kue Mine that include an indicated mineral resource for the Kelvin kimberlite and inferred mineral resources for the Faraday kimberlites. Kelvin is estimated to contain 13.62 million carats (Mct) at 8.50 million tons (Mt) at a grade of 1.60 carats/ton and a value of US$63/carat. Faraday 2 is estimated to contain 5.45Mct in 2.07Mt at a grade of 2.63 carats/ton and a value of US$140/ct. Faraday 1-3 is estimated to contain 1.90Mct to 1.87Mt at a grade of 1.04 carats/ton and a value of US$75/carat.


TSX:MPVD - Post by User

Comment by briton Oct 24, 2012 5:29pm
320 Views
Post# 20520148

RE: Hypothetical Question - rdge

RE: Hypothetical Question - rdge

Hey rdge,

 

You're right, Romney didn't go for the jugular,   However I wonder whether he and his advisors developed their debate strategy after concluding that Obama would likely spend his entire pre-debate week prepping for a Libya showdown. 

 

Romney, throughout his business career, in progressively more responsible and successful executive positions, has proven himself to be a outstanding strategist .  I think he refused to be drawn into a potential streetfight over the Libyan problem intentionally:

a] preferring to maintain a presidential presence during the final debate, and

b] clearly knowing that Obama's foreign policy, especially as it related to the Libyan fiasco, was already unravelling before the world's media, as investigations deepened.

 

Obama tried to steer him back on several occasions to a debate on Libya, but Romney, wisely I think, refocused the ensuing discussion on the Economy.

 

Well, after watching all the debates, that was my take.  Food for thought!

 

Cheers,

 

Brit

Bullboard Posts