RE: Re: DaviKing ( or "BarryThomas " ) Just because you repeat/repost something, in various forms, doesn’t mean that it is true or going to be true.
“same hightly respected company” - not sure many agree with that, especially former the shareholders of the previous incarnation of .mwc. and those that just had their shares diluted
And hasn’t the term of service been changed, for at least one of the “consulted” companies? Correct me if I’m wrong!! Problem is, you never do answer the questions, you just repost your diatribe. AFter a couple or more years, it gets a bit tiring, when the companies, never back up your “comments”.
“Both use Renmark” and what has that brought to the table? Seems to me the stock price goes down each year they present.
“both are unusually modest when it comes to promoting themselves:” Why would they need to when they have a shill doing their work.
“...market caps that are embarrassing, yet effective at keeping buying pressure at bay” - despite your best efforts to pump, there is nothing that has been presented by the companies that would cause buying pressure, so people sell, stock is down and you are scrambling trying to put a positive spin on “nothing”.
“Both have first class individuals...” Not sure that McCrae is considered first class by the LL’s. Dr. Paul seems pretty classy and smart but timelines have been set back a year or more. But I’m sure they will be fast-tracked. NOT
“Deep pockets”.. The Aussies are down more than 50%, maybe they sold, too??
“both have boards MOSTLY populated by BASHERS. I thought “mostly”, was more than 50% but I don’t see that.
“both are likely to produce MASSIVE gains... that IMHO. Well, that might come to fruition but at least you couched it with IMHO.
“both recently had Latimer show up...” Tell us why this is so important and how many shares did they gobble up? Gawd, did I just ask you to repost something? Ahhh.
You tend to exaggerate just a little and your allegorical/obtuse posts make it difficult to take you seriously.