Making a mistake. I know I shouldn't do this since it will lead to no good but I can't resist.
Light-headed-tunnel. I'm curious why you are on this board continually ridiculing anyone who says anything positive about both CLQ and about lithium in any of its forms and uses. Surely you don't own any CLQ shares because then you could only be an idiot and I'm guessing you're not.
So, I'm left with a very implausible explanation and that is that you are invested in one of the other lithium plays that isn't doing too well and you're doing your darndest to cast doubt on CLQ in the hope that potential investors will maybe go to whatever stock you do own. Waste of time.
In the past three days there have been several articles on how ALL the automakers are investing heavily in the EV and hybrid end of the market, Ford in particular. Lithium battery development is proceeding at a furious pace. Huge companies llike Honda and Toyota are already claiming major breakthroughs. I don't ever recall any field in the past with so much emphasis being placed on it. It's mind boggling. And, because of this huge interest, I predict that it will be announced sooner rather than later that a breakthrough is going to make electric vehicles the only option for tomorrow.
As for your push on hydrogen, the question put to you by another poster is very relevant. Where will you find the immense energy needed for the electrolysis of water to generate enough hydrogen to run even a few vehicles? Finally, a few weeks back you said lithium batteries were doomed because they were dangerous and would catch fire. Well, buddy, do you honestly think that a highway filled with cars each with a tank of compressed hydrogen is a wondrous thing to contemplate? Just wait for the first multi-car conflagration to put an end to that notion.
Good luck to all those who are thinking straight.
I now expect 'light' and his other namesakes to have a field day with what I've said. Go ahead dummies.
Split.