Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mega Precious Metals Inc MPRXF



GREY:MPRXF - Post by User

Comment by RMC12345on Dec 11, 2012 4:47pm
173 Views
Post# 20715523

Far from Dead in the Water!

Far from Dead in the Water!

You said " They had a theory,drilled it off and it didn't pan out."

You are right!  It hasn't panned out ..... yet!  But not because the HGZ is not there.

How can Headway be 'dead in the water" as you put it, when the geological model proposed before the drilling started was closely verified.  And when the drilling stopped in the beginnings of the alteration package that encloses the HGZ a few hundred metres before where the model predicted the HGZ should be?

As far as I am concerned, the Headway is far from 'dead in the water'.  It was unfortunate Lane Christenson pulled out when they did - shutting down the drilling so close to the target zone.

There is a high level of interest in Headway and a deal will be done to complete the drilling.  It's just a matter of what's in the deal.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>