RE: RE: Presentation. I am guessing that was the presentation they put together for when they started the current money raise. It looks good when you are trying to raise 750 grand to show you have a major (5 million) and aggressive (starting January) plan for developing the flagship project; people want to get the sense of the possibility for a quick bump in the SP. It appears not a lot of people were buying the story and the 750 grand raise got cut back to its current level. I think we still have yet to hear about the 5 million raise so I am guessing the 1 mill they plan to spend in the next six weeks is in jeopardy.
You need to understand that a lot of the junior market is based on smoke and mirrors or hype and promo. If you look like a wounded duck investors will treat you like a leper. If your plans sound like a wounded duck investors will treat you like a leper. If you come across as sounding sincerely excited and your plans come across as sounding believable, logical, achievable and LUCRATIVE money will flow.
As for the presentation, I find it way too long... 40+ pages and people are bored; 5-7 MAX unless you have a major ongoing program. In my opinion all the blah blah on all the what I consider the secondary borderline prospects should be cut to one page MAX so it doesn't distract people. I mean it is nice to know there is a fallback plan if things don't work out with the current gem, but the bulk of the portfolio is fairly weak in my opinion and should not be highlighted.