Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

WESTERN POTASH CORP T.WPX

"Western Potash Corp is engaged in the acquisition, evaluation, and exploration of mineral properties containing potash in Western Canada. The Company holds interests in the Milestone Project located in Southern Saskatchewan."


TSX:WPX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by boredhousewifeon Dec 20, 2012 1:09pm
310 Views
Post# 20756560

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: WPX like ORKO

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: WPX like ORKO

The question was just that AAA...I asked her in another recent email which has not been replied to yet still waiting why they would waste money on another finanical advisor unless they were unhappy with their recent advisor on those deals with the other parties before the FS...My guess and only in hypothetic terms the deal which whomever it maybe is the financial advisor ( which they will have to name)that is going to actually corner the whole deal... example like an IPO offering they hire someone who would do the deal and close it up for a fee...and may not be Lockwood who does it.. WPX must be engaging another advisor as, she states  of the strategic alternatives side of it and they may want someone more experienced in the situation is my guess.. Who knows why...I believe she would not write in such terms because investors relations have a duty to shareholders fudicary to supply details they are allowed to say only... Or they can get in trouble for supplying mis-informed truths.. Guess we will see and wait to see what NR comes out next..JMHO

Bullboard Posts