GREY:CPYCF - Post by User
Comment by
chrisaleon Dec 31, 2012 4:35pm
123 Views
Post# 20785580
RE: RE: RE: Hydrology and Protecting Water Supply.
RE: RE: RE: Hydrology and Protecting Water Supply. "Calls for the BC government to map underground aquifers is expensive and only stands as an unnecessary delay."
This is according to your professional opinion right? Where do you get off telling anyone any study is "useless"? Does your "people like me" comment include Regional Districts representing tens of thousands of people? Because that's who's asking for the aquifer mapping. Unanimously I might add.
It doesn't seem like too much to ask to me. It is peoples drinking water afterall.
No one is 'abusing' the EA process. In fact I've been invited more than once along with others by the CEAA/BCEAO to participate and contribute even more than is otherwise expected. I commend them for that and thye have done an excellent job I think so far. The aquifer mapping is simply a hole that needs to be filled.
To call this a 'clean' project is laughable, but at least you have one thing right, I am totally against burning any coal. Period.