RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Nick Abe & David Grunw Ok TG. That being said it looks like you have soent a lot more than 5 minutes on their blog OR you have a pretty accurate fast reading technique. In any case, everybody knows that INT MUST show revenues and i do not think there is anybody (longs) that would say the opposite. BUT we also have to look at INT as an incubator company that is trying to get the best possible outcome for it's division and it cannot happen without partnerships and investment. Have they made mistakes during the last 2 years: YES they did as any other business will do. Even after 2-3 years any tech company is still a start up and until revenues start coming in (interesting revenues) they have to be looked at that way. Until good revenues starts coming in INT will still be a speculative buy. But investing in Venture companies (the name says it all) means that there is a great risk reward possibility. I do believe that INT has the needed team and product to succeed. WIll it be this week, this month or this quarter: NOBODY knows. Not you, not Cuzz not tzero (they maybe the same anyways). INT will let investors know when they have the material info to be disclose as any other company. Not before, not after. And if somebody tells me down the road that as part of their DD, they have to go to the extend of analysing the coding of their website, well that is non-sense unless one really wants to use every bit of anything to destroy a company value.This is the part where i found very interesting that you knew Nick and David and that you sounded like them based upon your post and combined to the fact that you seem very knowledgeable in website programming, it did ring a bell. François