RE: RE: RE: RE: Re-cap of June 14th meeting Some would love INT to come out and say it but as they are in a highly competitive field I should hope that they do not. As for the money spent and the value of the end product I don't know that there is a correlation. You can spend $50K on a website or $1000 and get the same thing. I know that personally but I'm sure some hear will have another insightful comment.
However Ortsbo was created technically it is not a static product. The company announced the translation Wiki they've started and have on several occasions discussed the micro-domains that are customer specific. It is growing and getting better.
There are a lot of very interesting unanswered questions - which may have something to do with the enormous attention this stock seems to garner from stock bashers.
The September 7, 2011 NR is significant. It indicates what may be the overall strategic aim for Ortsbo Inc. - to be utilized/bought by MS. Likely a 5 year target for realization. There is already a seemingly partner like relationship between INT and MS, however muted and downplayed. Ortsbo wasn't conceived as part of INT until after the arrival of an ex MS BoD, and after his addition, then departure, with the INT BoD, Ortsbo was launched. Ortsbo is Mark Hale's (SaaS) development. Question is, Who put the pieces together? INT/DL or MS? For MS or any other Co. to take a ownership stake in Ortsbo Inc., Ortsbo.com has had to be shown to 1) work 2) be marketable 3) be flexible 4) be the market leader. INT is in a race to position Ortsbo as the market leader for realtime chat translation services and be profitable.
LINK