Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Western Wind Energy Corp V.WND



TSXV:WND - Post by User

Comment by bakken13on Jan 23, 2013 11:57pm
104 Views
Post# 20881583

RE: RE: RE: RE: last thought for the night

RE: RE: RE: RE: last thought for the night

You are adding revenues to assets?

I do admit there is value in the tax shields, but it questionable exactly what a buyer would pay for them.

And putting a price tag of $1.53/share on Yabucoa is a bit of a stretch.

I am trying to be conservative, while you expect the buyers to pay full price, and more, for everything.

It simply doesn't work that way. Sorry to burst your bubble.

But I am being conservative for a reason. If my cautious numbers say a minimum of $3/share, then buying at $2.50 should be reasonably safe, plus I still have the potential of getting more than that minimum as a bonus.

It is much better than putting the maximum value on everything, which just sets you up for disapppointment, and would lead an investor to pay far too much for their shares.

Now, think about it, which do you think is the more intelligent approach? Honestly?

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>