RE: RE: RE: Speak to my Lawyer Bugoff not to me Ok, I"ll play the devil's advocate for you... I'm AO and I stated that the company is in a strong position... but to me a strong position can be "market leader", upcoming contract, perceived strength in IP; it could be construed in amy different ways. IMHO, as long as the company has a safe harbour clause (which they did), you will never win a law suit.
Don't get me wrong, go ahead and try, but I hate the idea of someone posting one day that they are, then the next day they aren't then they change the position again to suing the Alberta court system, yadda, yadda, yadda...
A good lawyer will tell you that you don't have more than 1/2 of one percent of a chance to win.
You have to admit, I was right from day one on this. Even when ppl were saying that it was a good stock, I cautioned people about it. Then I told you what would happen once the company's stock was halted. Then I was right about the dispersal (if you want to call it that). And I can tell you right now that I'm right again.
I have no vested interest in saying one way or the other... and I have no reason to lie. There has been more people than I who have told this BB what to expect and those views and experiences from other stocks are and have been ignored.
Go ahead and sue, but you're throwing good money after bad, because AO or anyone else has already hidden their assets from the Court system, and "Poynt" the company is what they call a shell company now; it has a trading number, but no assets, no IP, no admin., no nothing... and even IF someone could be sued to regain lost assets or cash, the unsecured lenders would have already beaten you to the punch.