RE: Thoughts for bluedart, illumination1 I am curious why you would feel this way now instead of at the lowest point of shareholder sentiment when the solar end was bleeding the company dry and a lot of insider selling had taken place. The companies patents were collateral against a failing business. So now that they are moving in a positive direction you choose to be so defeatist about this company?
Tryharder you write: I am sure that most of us here were thinking that the validation was to come from a well renowned firm or institute at arm’s length, and that it would have a process and steps independent of any product the validating instance would need to develop for it’s own use.
So validation coming from one of the world’s leading military contractor is a bad thing?
I guess they don’t really qualify results ahead of multimillion dollar contracts with governments around the world and are not to be trusted. After all it’s not like their reputation is on the line if they falsefy results of POET. Yes they would have so much gain by falsefying results.
So buddy… I can’t read your stuff any further to make any more comments. Your tryingharder to come off very fair like but come on do you really think because you put such a big effort into writing this long drawn out apparent heart felt essay that statements like the one above are going to be more palatable?