GREY:GYPHQ - Post by User
Comment by
metcoalfanon Feb 03, 2013 1:51pm
133 Views
Post# 20931106
RE: RE: Alternatives...
RE: RE: Alternatives... I suppose there is a 2nd alternative to raising the cash that is probably going to be needed over the next 6 months (again, the real lynchpin to my whole thesis is that they still have about 4 mm cash in the bank at the end of Dec - essentially that they conserved it and let the payables go way up with all of the boiler problems). The deal valued Borealis at 28 mm. Then the deal called for a 4 mm capital call going forward, which then puts a value of 32 mm on Borealis. GGN could in essence raise 4.5 mm by giving up 15% of the total JV, taking them down to a 25% interest in 7 months. At that point in 7 months, there would be something like 6 mm in debt left, 25% of Borealis, no dilution to the share structure of GGN. Or GGN can do some combination of share dilution vs JV dilution. It's an ugly outcome for all of us - on an absolute basis, I'm very disappointed; on a relative basis - relative to the reality of poor performance at the mine site for the last 18 months - GGN equity is still in the game on a long term basis I believe.....we still need to see some year end data because if they don't have something close to 4 mm in the bank, all bets are off. At the end of the day, I still don't think it's in Waterton's enlightened self-interest to let GGN completely fail.