Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Gryphon Gold Corp GYPHQ

Gryphon Gold Corporation is a mine development company. The Company's principal asset is Borealis property. The Borealis Property is 27.5 square miles located in the Walker Lane gold belt of western Nevada. The Company's land position covers approximately 17,600 acres for the Borealis property and over 60 Nevada exploration properties, which cover approximately 70 square miles in the state's gold trends. The Borealis property has approximately 1.4 million ounces of measured and indicated gold resources, and approximately 1.1 million ounces of inferred gold resources have been accredited to the one square mile Central Borealis zone. Its Borealis property has over five other prospective zones that are being explored, which have the potential to host significant gold resources. The Company continued drilling on the Borealis property in the Graben resource, and in the central and western pediment areas.


GREY:GYPHQ - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by metcoalfanon Feb 03, 2013 5:43pm
137 Views
Post# 20931587

RE: RE: An at large question

RE: RE: An at large question

Now we are talking.  The 35 came from the roughly 25 million debt referenced in the p/r, plus the 4 mm in payables I was assuming in an earlier post, plus the 4 mm capital call which was also in the p/r - I rounded up a little bit - maybe there are several millions that could be shaved off.  You absolutely get to pick slate of directors and should be CEO if you bring that to the table.  The directors and CEO have not performed over the last year - my lack of disdain for the Waterton deal should not be confused with any remote sense of satisfaction with lack of real progress at the Borealis over the last 18 months.  I only like this Waterton deal in the absence of a viable alternative.  I for sure as shoot didn't buy in for this deal on the table. 

Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse