Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Camrova Resources Inc V.CAV.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  BAJFF

Camrova Resources Inc. is a Canada-based mining company. The Company operates in one business segment, being the acquisition, exploration and development of resource properties. It has a minority investment in the El Boleo copper-cobalt-zinc-manganese deposit located near Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico. In addition, the Company intends to investigate and potentially pursue alternative project opportunities.


TSXV:CAV.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by geezer321on Feb 07, 2013 4:32pm
274 Views
Post# 20954679

RE: RE: RE: All Eyes on When the Mine Will Complet

RE: RE: RE: All Eyes on When the Mine Will Complet

Repost to refine and make minor corrections:

"...why is the KC dumping so much money into this?...."

 

There is a misconception that the Korean Consortium has dumped more money into this project then others when in actual fact that is not so.  The vast majority of financing is debt and the Korean Consortium has carried a smaller share of the equity portion then Baja.

 

The Korean Consortium gained an additional 21% of Boleo from Baja shareholders that is equivalent to 340,213,025 x 21/70 = 10,206,390 shares for  $90,000.000.00 or $0.1134/share and the $90,000,000.00 did not go to Baja but to MMB for over budget funding.  The Korean Consortium lost nothing but in fact gained a 21% interest that is now more valuable as the NPV of Boleo is increasing as the trailing 4 year copper price has increased and construction of Boleo has advanced. See "Reevaluation of Net Present Value" below.

 

Another  $144,000,000.00 in over budget funding did not come from the Korean Consortium but came as loans the Korean Consortium sourced from Kores that will have to be paid back at some interest rate that has not been revealed.

 

Another $21,000,000.00 in over budget funding was a wash because both the Korean Consortium and Baja put up their 70/30 split on a cash call from MMB.  $14.7 million came from Baja and $6.3 million from the Korean Consortium.

 

Another $35,000,000.00 in over budget funding came from Louis Dreyfus.

 

Over Budget Funding

News release date      Particulars                                                                     Amount        Balance

 

        23 Nov '10         Louis Dreyfus irrevocable letter of credit

                                  for equity cost overrun cashed                                          35               35

        20 Jun  '12         21M cash call paid (Baja 14.7M, KC 6.3M)                       21               56

        28 Aug  '12        Sale of 21% of Baja interest to Korean Consortium          90             146

           4 Dec  '12       Total of 3 Kores loans since Oct '12                                 144             290

 

 

$290,000,000.00 has been spent over and above the capex budget of $1,143,000,000.00.  MMB is now back on to spending senior debt funds to complete the Boleo project.  MMB drew down the first $115,000,000.00 on 28 January 2013 on the resorted $419,000,000.00 senior debt facility taken over by Kores Exim from US.Exim.

 

The real white knight in dealing with this cost overrun situation is Baja and not the Korean Consortium.  Baja is out of pocket $90 million with nothing to show for it other then maybe protecting their reaming 49% interest in Boleo and the Koreans are out nothing and in fact have gained with appreciation in value of the 21% they purchased and the loans they made will be repaid with interest.

 

 
$290 million has been expended over and above budget, more then the $246 million over expenditure initially estimated by an independent company. I would largely discount the additional managment estimate issued when Mount Kellett had board control for a number of reasons, one major one being that they arbitrarily piled on an additional contingency of $53.5 million and their other additional estimates look inflated and some of their owner cost overrun estimates likely never materialized because of the transfer of control to the Korean Consortium and because the extra $44million spent over the independently estimated $246 million likely covered off any incurred costs in the additional managment expenditures estimate and because I do not believe a mining contractor was engaged as first planned and because Mount Kellett may have had motivations to inflate the estimated cost overruns. 
 
 
Reevaluation of Net Present Value
 

Baja owns 49% of Boleo project whose NPV (8% discount) has risen $195,170,000.00 to $1,501,170,000.00 from $1,306,000,000.00 economic assessment of Boleo in the March 2010 technical update that said:

Financial modelling, using the Case 1 prices and 23 years for the project life, shows that the project could generate a net after- tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 25.6% and an after tax NPV (using 8% discount rate) of $1,306 million. (page 11)

Case 1 financial modelling of the project was done using the weighted average three-year trailing metal price (in accordance with SEC guidelines) at December 31, 2009 of $2.91/lb for copper; $26.85/lb for cobalt; and $1,175/tonne for zinc sulphate monohydrate flat over the life of the project. (page 179)

 

Since March 2010 metal price have changed that will be reflected in the SRK report.

 

As of 1 Feburary 2013 Copper is $3.75/lb, Cobalt $12.25/lb.  

 

Average prices over the last 4 years is approximately $3.50 for copper, aproximately $17.50 for cobalt.  Copper prices have been up and down but trending higher since September 2011 and projected to continue appreciating.  Cobalt has been tending lower since the begining of 2010 but trending higher in the last number of months.

 

Boleo financials are sensitive to copper and cobalt pricing. The after tax NPV @ 8% to a 10% price increase is 3.26 more sensitive to copper over cobalt.  (table 19.7 of the technical update, page 196.  10% increase in copper price will result in a 15.24% increase in after tax NPV and a 10% increase cobalt will result in a 4.67% increase in after tax NPV:  15.23/4.67 = 3.26). 

 

In sum over the last 4 years, using an average copper price of $3.50 and cobalt price of $17.50 there has been an average copper price increase of  20.3% an average cobalt price decrease of 34.8% over the case 1 prices used in the technical update. 

 

Effectively copper's relative price impact on Boleo's after tax NPV is 20.3% x 3.26 = 66.18% vs 34.8% for cobalt. Effectively the average copper price increase over the last 4 years has had a 1.9 (66.18/34.8) greater positive impact on the after tax NPV despite the decline in cobalt prices over the last 4 years.

 

In short, if a 10% copper price increase adds $199,000.000.00 to the NPV then a 20.3 % increase in copper prices would add  $403,970,000.00 and if a 10% cobalt decrease removes $60,000,000.00 from the NPV then a 34.8% decrease in cobalt prices would remove $208,800,000.00.  The net effect is the NPV would increase $195,170,000.00.  (table 19.7 of the technical update, page 196.)

 

The NPV is also sensitive to capital costs that have increased with overruns. This increase in NPV for the Boleo project has more then offset the $144,000,000.00 in short term loan cost overrun funding Kores Corp has provided.  

 

Accounting for both the average increase/decresase in copper and cobalt and cost overrun expenditures to date the NPV has increased $51,170,000.00 to $1,357,170,000.00.

 

Given Boleo economics adequately supported cost overruns even before copper price increases and certainly now with a higher average copper price over the last 4 years compared to case one and  given the copper supply/demand fundementals point to higher prices, and given cost controls have been in place for about 8 months, and given newer hindsight data will likely result in a positive fine tuned SRK report and possibly recommend manganese production, and given the cost overrun estimate was inflated by Mount Kellett I would venture little if any additional funding will be required and if so then it will be by way of a further loans and Baja's and the Consortiums project share will remain as they currently are.  

 

Basically, the Korean Consortium has paid for and gained an additional 21% interest in the Boleo project that is worth more than its assessed economic value in March 2010.

 

The $90,000,000.00 the Korean Consortium paid for the additional 21% stake in Boleo would value Baja's 49% stake at $210,000,000.00 at the time.

 

Bullboard Posts