Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining Project (Raven Project).


GREY:CPYCF - Post by User

Comment by mokitaon Feb 10, 2013 12:25am
128 Views
Post# 20964326

CEC claims of ROBUST economics lack EVIDENCE

CEC claims of ROBUST economics lack EVIDENCE

 

Wood Mckenzie, who did the financial analysis for Raven economics bases  projections of robust economics on outdated  2010 prices and projections.  CEC feasibility study uses $174 a tonne average price (Met andThermal) to claim feasibility wheras today's average price is $105 a tonne.  Yet in its Jan. 2013 website update,  CEC  continues to state ROBUST economics that are contradicted by  the World Bank, Platt and Zacks.   Wood McKenzie's Disclaimer regarding its analysis of Raven economics reads:  They (prices) have been arrived at following careful consideration and enquiry but we do not guarantee their fairness, completeness or accuracy. The opinions, as of this date, are subject to change. We do not accept any liability for your reliance upon them.  

.

Feasibility is questioned further by substantial missing items from budget that include finance charges, compensation for First Nations for loss of fish habitat, expected to be in the millions,  mitigation measures for AMD that can be predicted to be similar to the Union Bay and Quinsam Mine AMD seeps given similar geological conditions, security bond that is likely to be similar to Quinsam Mine's $7.281 million.  

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>