Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

BioExx Specialty Proteins Ltd BIXZF

"Bioexx Specialty Proteins Inc is engaged in the development and commercialization of processing technologies, for use in the extracting various active ingredients from organic and inorganic materials. The company's primary focus is on the production of proteins from canola and other oilseed feedstocks. Its products include Isolexx, a protein isolate for use in bakery products, meat products, vegetarian food products and meat analogues, and nutritional and protein bars, drinks, and supplements;


GREY:BIXZF - Post by User

Comment by dwruddockon Feb 10, 2013 8:57am
181 Views
Post# 20964616

RE: From Reuters

RE: From Reuters

Could not add this text to the previous post for some reason.  So, that chart, according to Reuters is a chart of the "Insiders", even though it generalizes by saying "Institutional" in the title.  I don't like what I am seeing there.  I am wondering if anyone has any information that would either support or contradict what Reuters has posted.  I check Reuters often and this was just added yesterday.  I found it interesting and a little disturbing.  Let's come together and search all of our resources to see what is going on with these "reported" changes in insider positions. I have a hard time believing this is all correct because we should have seen some filings about any officers change in holdings, then again, we should have seen or heard of some OTHER things/filings by now as well.  

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>