RE: RE: Jimbo29 Skippy I was responding to Jimbo's post. The whole comment by Jimbo is as follows:
They where flow through shares which gave the investor a tax break, but you have to wonder when the party will end unless the SP appreciates. Almost all monies raised investors took a hit on principal. I don't care if you guys agree with me but our CEO needs to start giving us shareholder value especially before the AGM. I can't believe only some here are unsatisfied with all these promises mentioned and none delivered other than HQ news and no one cared. Start asking the tougher questions or else we will be here in another year looking at 70 cents and listening to all the same pumpers.
I should have copied the whole thing instead of the bolded area above. So the questions I asked were in response to Jimbo's comment highlited in yellow.
Here they are again......
Tough questions,
Gary, is it a fact that you paid $2,000,000 for the HQ technology? If not how much did you pay?
Gary, what is the on going royalty due to HQ for the technology? 5% or 7% or what? You have neglected to disclose this number in your latest yearly filing on SEDAR.
Would youlike us to start questioning on the NGC BB wrt delayed deliverables?
Do whatever you think you have to do. I would be interested in the many.