Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

WESTERN POTASH CORP T.WPX

"Western Potash Corp is engaged in the acquisition, evaluation, and exploration of mineral properties containing potash in Western Canada. The Company holds interests in the Milestone Project located in Southern Saskatchewan."


TSX:WPX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by cacheitinon Feb 12, 2013 3:10pm
259 Views
Post# 20976462

RE: RE: Financial post

RE: RE: Financial post

Retiring young- you are without doubt my favorite poster on stockhouse . 

I love your volume related posts.

Today $186,000 of shares traded on krn versus $36,000 on wpx.

I hope wpx gets a buyout sooner rather than later, because as much as I enjoy your posts, I would prefer to see you make money as lose it. Any takeout will be at a premium to the current sp. not 10 times it.

i really wish you all could work out the numbers and compare to krn(the mag byproduct is worth close to $100 million as a stand alone product). 

Wpx will have close to(IMHO) $100 added to their costs because they will have to structure a very generous royalty deal to get into production . It is the only way they can make it work(IMHO). I spoke with wpx IR and she admitted that the interest payments were way to high on a $3.3 Billion build to make it feasible.

she said they were looking at other options and the only thing that I can figure that makes sense is a royalty deal like the gold companies do. If u do the math after these royalties/opex/taxes/transport/sustaining capex and government royalties are added together you could be looking at a total cost per ton of $320 to $350 per ton.

that leaves $70 - $100 per ton profit and at full production(and it will take 10 years to reach that) that is a healthy profit of $200- 300 if potash prices don't fall any further.

but if they do fall below $400 it won't be shareholders that are winning, it will be whatever entity that signed the royalty agreement and fronted the bulk of the $3.3 billion. And if they include any debt interest in that , you can expect the total costs per ton to increase substantially .

Bullboard Posts