RE: RE: Honeywell's Unit - Competition Not You are right regarding the extensive amount of technologies that Honeywell's EMS provides, however, after "study(ing) it all together", I can find nothing comparable to Flyht's.
Perhaps, instead of sending reader's on a wild goose chase through such a broad link, you can narrow the link down to the technology, or technologies, that you believe EMS provides that specifically replicates Flyht's.
Also, I've got to ask, why did you provide the link in your earlier post to Honeywell's Primus product when it has very little in common with Flyht's product and you premise your post with, "Honeywell seems to have the edge."? What do you mean - since we are comparing apples to oranges?
You further appear to defend this in your last post by stating, "To only view the Honeywell Primus product does not enable one to fully comprehend the background." Well, you only provided the Primus product info. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to how, "fully comprehending the background." will make a dissimilar product similar. I'm struggling to follow your logic.
Finally, I defend my "rather bold statement" with the L-3 Aviation Products, Sarasota, Fla., September 24, 2012, press release titled, "L-3 Aviation Recorders Signs Agreement with Airbus for SATCOM Solutions on A320 Family of Aircraft", which states, "L-3 Aviation Recorders announced today that it has signed an agreement with Airbus to certify and provide the FLYHT Aerospace Solutions Ltd. AFIRS 228S real-time data communications and SATCOM solution for installation on thre Airbus A320 family of aircraft." And here's the link https://www.l-3ar.com/pdf/pr/AP-AR-L-3%20and%20FLYHT%20SatCom%20agreement%20with%20Airbus_FINAL_Sep24_2012_.pdf
Why not just show the equivalent technology that presently exists and you've made your case - unless, of course, you can't?
Greg
P.S. The reference to "we" simply pertains to being a shareholder. I have no affiliation otherwise with the company.