Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Atikwa Resources Inc. V.ATK

An oil and natural gas company


TSXV:ATK - Post by User

Comment by ellornoon Mar 01, 2013 11:06am
258 Views
Post# 21062035

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Interesting....

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Interesting....

The 'point' is that people make comments about the value of the land to where they have the mineral rights, and the value of said land being part of the company's portfolio.   Saskatchewan took initiative way back in the early 1900's and bought up most of the mineral rights, with some exceptions of course.  But to most land parcels, the mineral rights are the property of  "Her Majesty the Queen".

 

So, like I said, mineral rights and surface parcels are two separate things...  I figured that was made pretty clear in my earlier comment.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>