Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

NEO Battery Materials Ltd V.NBM

Alternate Symbol(s):  NBMFF

NEO Battery Materials Ltd. is a Canadian battery materials technology company. It is focused on developing silicon anode materials for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles, electronics, and energy storage systems. With a patent-protected, low-cost manufacturing process, it enables longer-running and ultra-fast charging batteries compared to existing technologies. It is a producer of silicon anode materials for the electric vehicle and energy storage industries. It is developing and optimizing its silicon anode materials, NBMSiDE, through its all-in-one manufacturing process. Its three types of products, NBMSiDE-P100, NBMSiDE-P200, and NBMSiDE-C100 are manufactured through its nanocoating technology and are based on metallurgical-grade silicon with purities of at least 99.95%. It has developed a nanocoating process to manufacture silicon anodes. Its material provides improvements in capacity and efficiency over lithium-ion batteries using graphite in their anode materials.


TSXV:NBM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by yukoninvestoron Mar 07, 2013 4:48pm
172 Views
Post# 21096339

RE: RE: well....

RE: RE: well....

I missed you Zuckonit; your online tough guy persona, the insults, the threats... basically everything about you was missed. So a hearty welcome back to you, and now onto business.

Can you please tell me how this deal proves the Engineer Mine is economic?

Can you also let me know what false opinions I have made that I could be sued for?

In my opinion this deal tells me that BCG was unable to find financing to fire up the mine themselves (probably to the benefit of BCG's shareholders), and have decided to lease the ground to a company. I think in this situation the company that is coming in is willing to take a stab at things to see if it will work, and if it doesn't they aren't out all that much. The deal reminds me of a typical small scale placer mining deal in which a land-owner has ground but no money or expertise and the guy coming in has the tools but no property and is un-willing to pay money out of pocket to the land-owner. In my opinion the problem with placer deals of this nature is that gold can go missing and unless the landowner has someone there 24-7 he can never be sure what was actually recovered. Not sure how those worries will play out with a hard-rock deal or these particular players.

 

Bullboard Posts