Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

01 Communique Laboratory Inc V.ONE

Alternate Symbol(s):  OONEF

01 Communique Laboratory Inc. is a Canada-based enterprise level cybersecurity provider. The Company has two business units. Its primary focus is on its cyber security business unit focusing on post-quantum cybersecurity with the development and commercialization of its IronCAP technology. IronCAP patent protected cryptographic system is an advanced Goppa code-based post-quantum cryptographic technology that can be implemented on classical computer systems. The Company’s other business unit consists of its remote access business which provides its customers with a suite of secure remote access services and products under its I’m InTouch and I’m OnCall product offerings. Its IronCAP Toolkits are available to vendors and can be used by vendors to build secure post-quantum systems for blockchain, 5G/IoT, data storage, encryption, digital signing and comply with the PKCS#11, OpenSSL and OpenPGP standards. Its IronCAP X is a cybersecurity product for email/file encryption.


TSXV:ONE - Post by User

Comment by rodanion Mar 17, 2013 5:36pm
245 Views
Post# 21142998

RE: RE: RE: RE: Is this a stupid question?

RE: RE: RE: RE: Is this a stupid question?

Obviously we would not be on the eve of a trial after several years of litigation and failed summary judgement applications if LOGM had a viable defence based on its own protected technology.

Can anyone point to LOGM having pleaded this at any time during the case? If not I believe we can safely assume that it is a non-runner.

Perhaps some posters are going out of their way to scare investors.....

Bullboard Posts