RE: validity? ...therefore, IF they can make that ruling that 01's patent is valid then that must mean that LOGM's is not valid cause they didn't state that it was. When comparing, one must compare apples to apples.The fact that the jury recognized in their infinite wisdom that ONE's patent is valid, left a weird 'taste in my mouth' syndrome. It just seemed that it has taken forever for the USPTO to come up with an answer, in fact, years of scrutiny, yet, in 3hrs or so, a group of 8 women and 4 men can just through out this tidbit of a statement as if to say, "We'll give LOGM the non part and save them $$$$'s, so just to make you feel not too miserable, we'll confirm that your patent is valid and see what you can do with that."
...this in itself may be an area of matter of law for grounds for appeal, for this was never in question! Totally confusing statement,as if," hopefully this will soothe your pain for your losses...at least we said you have a patent". There may be more to this than meets the eye for lawyers for 01.
...have a good 01
...gg