Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:STTYF - Post by User

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Post by andyxXxon Apr 01, 2013 6:28am
413 Views
Post# 21190650

novadx stream

novadx stream

That is also my big question. Almost everything in the annual report was expected, except this impairment. Which scenario is behind this impairment:

  1. Novadx stream is written-off and the money has gone.
  2. Nolan wants to be on the safe side and made this impairment. Maybe in some years the stream will start and we make some money.

What do you think? Elmo what is your opinion?

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities