RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Analyse This I may consider voting for getting rid of the current shareholders protection plan but why is not the new plan proposed first?
Even with PRE at the helm of CGX, a larger than PRE entity can attempt a CGX takeover in the future. If that happened, what would be a protection in place for shareholders outside of PRE?
Why would PRE need to get rid of shareholders rights – should not a new shareholders protection plan be proposed first before throwing the old one out?