Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
News Focus
Silver North Intersects 1.83 metres True Width of 1,088 g/t Silver, 3.90 g/t Gold (click to learn more)
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mart Resources Inc MAUXF

Energy Oil & Gas E&P


OTCPK:MAUXF - Post by User

Mart Resources Inc > Legal claim
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by sgandzaon Apr 02, 2013 7:38pm
255 Views
Post# 21201470

RE: Legal claim

RE: Legal claim

I have been wondering the same thing - does the force majeure mean they don't have to pay Mart? If that is the case, there is serious risk that the next divvy doesn't get paid. And I've said it before at these prices the market thinks the divvy is in danger.

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities