Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Stream Oil & Gas Ltd SOGAF



GREY:SOGAF - Post by User

Comment by dr_airtimeon Apr 02, 2013 8:12pm
252 Views
Post# 21201594

RE: RE: Albanian Tax Code - Deferred income tax

RE: RE: Albanian Tax Code - Deferred income tax

 

Forget a step. The $9M expense literally represents the differences in future tax payable based on carrying value of the accounting vs. tax PPE assets so you need to tax effect the carrying values of each. Let's round the actual accounting varrying value of PPE per Stream's BS of $58M to $60M. You would need a tax carrying value of $30M for the equivalent PPE per below.

 

Assuming a 30% tax rate the difference could arise from these values at year end

 

Accounting carrying value: $60M x 30% = $18M in future tax shield

Tax carrying value: $30M x 30% = $9M in future tax shield

 

$18M - $9M = $9M deferred income tax expense and the year end entry in my previous post is the same.

 

Same rule applies – deferred income tax expense caused when tax carrying value is less than accounting carrying value.

 

If you really read into it it is because the Albanian tax regime likely allows accelerated depreciation of PPE on a basis other than unit-of-production.

 

Again simply example and there are a lot of other variables that play into the calculation. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>