Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mira Resources Corp V.MRP



TSXV:MRP - Post by User

Comment by BlindBat_1on Apr 07, 2013 11:42am
207 Views
Post# 21222759

RE: RE: Will 5 Hold?

RE: RE: Will 5 Hold?

seeing that I was mentioned, I am here, being patient, regular calls to MRP, watching to progress unfold aiming at production, good luck to all longs.

ps, notice in the last MRP news More referred to MRP 22M barrels as 2P vice 2C.

==================================
 
Actually More is not an OIL man and that statement sort of reinforce the statement. Pay very close attention to the wording it is 2 P but not 2P Reserve, he states 2P Resources.
 
Technically speaking 2P Resources translates into Probable Resources, which is rated below 2C or 3C for that matter. Contigent Resourses is above Probable resources.
 
 
Furthermore, 2P resources would be referring to Undiscovered OIL, which obviously is not the case here - hence the statement should be 2C resources, not 2 P.
 
Still awaiting for the Schlumberger report to come out which hopefully puts and end to this confusion, and moves the field into some 2P RESERVE numbers.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>