RE: RE: RE: True width of mineralization Buckshot,
Good question and it is difficult to adequately portray without x-sections to draw on, but....
266m @ 1.23% in hole1210 - where do you link that to? core photos suggest a ~20 degree angle to core fracturing (along with mineral veining) so it would be possible to link this to the 204m @ 1.63%. That would suggest a width or between 50-60m. there could be a splay off to the east which accounts for the 104m @ 0.94%. Remember the Bor fault is a large regional structure which goes through the project area and I am making the assumption that this is the fluid conduit.
Section 1213-1217 suggests that the mineralisation has blown out a bit and may be up to +100m thick, though Hole 1216 may shed some light as any mineralisation at the base joining up with the 10% interval in hole 1213. would suggest a similar width of 50-75m.
I think one of the most interesting facts is holes 1332, 1329, 1333 and 1331, these are a long way from the centre of mineralisation and if they intersect any HS mineralisation this project could truley be world class. My gut is telling me that they are chasing the porphyry there but I hope I am wrong!
TS